Language

Monday, 16 June 2008

R u worried abt dth of Englsh?

Whew. My English teacher mother is not having a conniption in heaven this morning. According to Carolyn Y. Johnson's piece in the Boston Globe this morning, "Is language dead or evolving?", students still know the difference between the shorthand they use for texting and posting (remember, they don't use email). That said, it ain't exactly my mother's English class:

A growing body of research shows electronic communications channels like instant messaging have created a kind of semi-speech - language that is between talking and writing. Some say it is evidence of evolution, not of decay.

"Languages are always changing, and that's a fact that language snobs need to get over and accept - because the only language that doesn't change is a dead language, like Latin," said Derek Denis, a graduate student in linguistics at the University of Toronto. This spring, he coauthored a study comparing the way teens speak and chat online. It was published in the journal American Speech.

Denis's study, "Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language," followed the online and spoken conversations of 71 Canadian teens over three years, tracking about one million IM words and 250,000 spoken words.

Contrary to the view that abbreviations and cute emoticons are at the radical edge of English language, the researchers found that the hybrid of written and spoken language is actually more conservative than speech alone.

Saturday, 14 June 2008

Do I ask myself questions? Absolutely!

Do you? Listening to Pete Sampras, asks himself a question. Answers as if someone else has asked. Why are we questioning ourselves like this? Who started it? Is this a fad in French, Vietnamese, Portuguese? I don't know. And why don't I do it? ...

Friday, 06 June 2008

Who's that again?

This one almost slipped past but I haven't been able to stop thinking about it, which makes even more sense when I tell you what it is. Jonah Lehrer had a great piece in last Sunday's Boston Globe, "What's that name?", which makes clear how the brain retrieves information that you know is there but just can't find. Happens all the time, right, where you know you know someone's name but can only retrieve the first letter. Now I understand why I put myself through the rigors of the alphabet - starts with a B, Ba, Be.... Reason is that the brain stores information in different places according to unlikely associative patterns. Read the article. Jonah does a much better job than I can quickly do here.

(PS: I'm suffering blog-guilt of major proportions. Just realized I haven't blogged since Tues. Forty lashes with a wet post!)

Thursday, 27 September 2007

Worst things said at work (and sadly on occasion at home)

Boston Globe asked its readers for their least favorite "Workplace Jargon." Read it. It's a relief, particularly when you encounter the ones that make you cringe. Mine:

--"reach out," as in, "I just wanted to reach out to you," which triggers the shot back, "Please don't"
--"value-add," typically an early warning that none is to follow
--"touch base," puh-leez, and...

low hanging fruit, ramp up, boil the ocean, circle the wagons, and need I continue? Begs question: Are we thinking when we say these things? (Not me, of course, I'm too busy herding cats.)

Feeds

  • Technorati
    Add to Technorati Favorites

Google search


  • Google

    WWW
    endlessknots.typepad.com

  • Analytics